Re: [PATCH 08/12] iwlwifi: export DHC framework and add first public entry, twt_setup
From: Kalle Valo <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-18 07:51:09
Luca Coelho [off-list ref] writes:
On Sat, 2021-08-21 at 17:04 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:quoted
Luca Coelho [off-list ref] writes:quoted
From: Luca Coelho <redacted> Export the debug host command framework and add the twt_setup entry. This will allow external parties to use these debugging features. More entries can be added later on. Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <redacted>[...]quoted
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/Kconfig@@ -92,6 +92,12 @@ config IWLWIFI_BCAST_FILTERINGIf unsure, don't enable this option, as some programs might expect incoming broadcasts for their normal operations. +config IWLWIFI_DHC + bool "Enable debug host commands" + help + This option enables the debug host command API. It's used + for debugging and validation purposes. +Why a new Kconfig option? Those should not be added lightly.This is a debugging feature that is not really needed in production kernels, so we prefer to allow it to be removed so we don't waste resources.
What resources exactly? I would say if the admin or distro maintainer wants to save on resources he will disable IWLWIFI_DEBUGFS. Why do we need to have multiple Kconfig options for iwlwifi debugfs interface?
We're publishing this for a few reasons: 1. it will help prevent rebasing mistakes when sending patches upstream from our internal tree, because a lot of this code is spread around the driver; 2. in some occasions, we may ask advanced users to enable it so we can get more data and run more tests in case of tricky bugs; 3. for the specific case of twt_setup, this allows running some TWT test scenarios with our driver that wouldn't be easily available otherwise.
Sure, I understand all that. The better debug features we have in upstream the better. But I don't understand why a new Kconfig option is needed for DHC feature.
Is it okay to keep it?
In the past Linus has stated his dislike of adding pointless Kconfig options, with which I strongly agree, and to me it looks like IWLWIFI_DHC is exactly that. So I'm very hesitant about this. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches