Thread (10 messages) flat view 10 messages, 5 authors, 2022-03-30

Re: Revert: ath: add support for special 0x0 regulatory domain

From: Andrey Skvortsov <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-23 20:19:50

On 21-08-23 10:23, Brian Norris wrote:
On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 9:49 AM Andrey Skvortsov
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
4) As many users are affected by this problem and maintainers don't really
want to revert the problematic patch,
I'm not totally sure that's true. So far, it looks like an oversight.

Over a year ago, Kalle said he "just need[ed] to check something
internally first":
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/87r1rsbdnx.fsf@codeaurora.org/ (local)

I don't see the result of that, except that this is marked Superseded:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20200730124923.271429-1-alsi@bang-olufsen.dk/
and this is marked Rejected:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20200527165718.129307-1-briannorris@chromium.org/
I'm not sure if the Rejected was before or after the last reply above...

Maybe it needs an Nth person to submit a revert?
Later (Dec 23, 2020) said "Actually I don't see how I could apply the
revert due to the regulatory problems explained by Jouni". [1]
I think this could be the date when your patch was marked as Rejected.

1. http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/ath10k/2020-December/012370.html

-- 
Best regards,
Andrey Skvortsov
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help