Re: [PATCH] ath11k: Update tx descriptor search index properly
From: Peter Oh <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-04 03:09:02
Also in:
ath11k
On 2/3/21 5:08 PM, Karthikeyan periyasamy wrote:
On 2021-02-04 00:59, Peter Oh wrote:quoted
On 1/26/21 6:46 PM, Karthikeyan periyasamy wrote:quoted
On 2020-12-19 00:53, Peter Oh wrote:quoted
On 12/18/20 7:24 AM, Karthikeyan Periyasamy wrote:quoted
Tx descriptor search index field should be updated with hw peer id and not by AST Hash. Incorrect search index causes throughput degradation in all the platforms. so updated the search index field with hw peer id, which is a common change applicable for all the platforms. Tested-on: IPQ8074 hw2.0 AHB WLAN.HK.2.4.0.1-01492-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/peer.cb/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/peer.c index b69e7eb..f49abefa 100644--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/peer.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/peer.c@@ -309,7 +310,11 @@ int ath11k_peer_create(struct ath11k *ar,struct ath11k_vif *arvif, peer->pdev_idx = ar->pdev_idx; peer->sta = sta; - arvif->ast_hash = peer->ast_hash; + + if (arvif->vif->type == NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION) { + arvif->ast_hash = peer->ast_hash; + arvif->ast_idx = peer->hw_peer_id; + }How about non STATION type?no need of configuring the ast_idx, ast_hash field for non station type. Its recommended by HW/FW team.Can you add this comment in commit message?surequoted
Also could you include the answer to "what conditions you observed the throughput degradation?" in commit message too?In all the scenario will see degradation. Its a general improvement.
It sounds good and it will better if you share the number before and after the patch. Thanks, Peter