Re: pull-request: wireless-drivers-2021-02-05

quoted

Lorenzo, I'm just guessing what this code does, but you're dropping a
frag without invalidating the rest of the SKB, which I presume is now
truncated? Shouldn't the skb be dropped?
  

Hi Jakub,

I agree. We can do something like:

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/dma.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/dma.c
index e81dfaf99bcb..6d84533d1df2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/dma.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/dma.c

@@ -511,8 +511,9 @@ mt76_add_fragment(struct mt76_dev *dev, struct mt76_queue *q, void *data,
 {
 	struct sk_buff *skb = q->rx_head;
 	struct skb_shared_info *shinfo = skb_shinfo(skb);
+	int nr_frags = shinfo->nr_frags;
 
-	if (shinfo->nr_frags < ARRAY_SIZE(shinfo->frags)) {
+	if (nr_frags < ARRAY_SIZE(shinfo->frags)) {
 		struct page *page = virt_to_head_page(data);
 		int offset = data - page_address(page) + q->buf_offset;
 

@@ -526,7 +527,10 @@ mt76_add_fragment(struct mt76_dev *dev, struct mt76_queue *q, void *data,
 		return;
 
 	q->rx_head = NULL;
-	dev->drv->rx_skb(dev, q - dev->q_rx, skb);
+	if (nr_frags < ARRAY_SIZE(shinfo->frags))
+		dev->drv->rx_skb(dev, q - dev->q_rx, skb);
+	else
+		dev_kfree_skb(skb);
 }
 

I do not know if it can occur, but I guess we should even check q->rx_head
pointer before overwriting it because if the hw does not report more set to
false for last fragment we will get a memory leak as well. Something like:

@@ -578,6 +582,8 @@ mt76_dma_rx_process(struct mt76_dev *dev, struct mt76_queue *q, int budget)
 		done++;
 
 		if (more) {
+			if (q->rx_head)
+				dev_kfree_skb(q->rx_head);
 			q->rx_head = skb;
 			continue;
 		}