RE: [PATCH v6 1/2] rtw88: add regulatory process strategy for different chipset
From: Andy Huang <hidden>
Date: 2020-03-26 07:11:44
[ I'll preface this by saying that the more I look at the regulatory core, the more I realize I'm confused or wrong at times. So forgive me if I've made errors along the way, and please do correct me. ] On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 8:11 PM Andy Huang [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
quoted
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 03:52:15PM +0800, yhchuang@realtek.comwrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/Kconfigquoted
quoted
I'm still not sure why rtw88 needs this, and nobody else does. I readI think in Atheros driver, ATH_REG_DYNAMIC_USER_REG_HINTS configservesquoted
the same purpose.Ah, I forgot about that one, sorry.quoted
quoted
your commit message, but that doesn't sound like something that belongs in a single driver still.As our previous commit message claims, it is due to FCC [...]Yes, I saw that: my point was that effectively all drivers are subject to this FCC rule, and so this could be a common CONFIG_*. But if we already have the ATH_* one (I missed that, above), I guess we can have an rtw88 one too. It might be less confusing (and more straightforwardly-implemented) if we moved this stuff to the core someday, though.quoted
quoted
quoted
+ ret = regulatory_hint(hw->wiphy, rtwdev->efuse.country_code); + if (ret) + rtw_warn(rtwdev, "failed to hint regulatory: %d\n", ret);I don't think this is what you want; you had it right in previous revisions: if (!rtwdev->efuse.country_worldwide) { if (regulatory_hint(hw->wiphy,rtwdev->efuse.country_code))quoted
quoted
rtw_err( ... ); } Without the 'country_worlwide' check, you start "hinting" (even on worldwide chips) that you really wanted "country" 00 only, and so we *never* adapt to more strict country settings. That's not how world-wide settings are supposed to work.It doesn't mean that we want country 00 only, we will get country notifies from stack, and we will apply it if we accept it. We don't want stack tochangequoted
the channel plan for us.I noted this to you privately, but I don't believe it's expected to call regulatory_hint() with "00". See the kerneldoc: * @alpha2: the ISO/IEC 3166 alpha2 the driver claims its regulatory domain * should be in. If @rd is set this should be NULL. Note that if you * set this to NULL you should still set rd->alpha2 to some accepted * alpha2. Note that "00" is *not* actually an ISO 3166 alpha2 code.
Yes, I think you make sense, we will provide v7, which will be similar to v5 with more detailed explain in commit log. Tzu-En
The key problem I'm seeing: once you do this, you establish a wiphy-specific regd, and this regd never updates its country code or DFS region according to IE updates. So attributes like NL80211_ATTR_DFS_REGION and NL80211_ATTR_REG_ALPHA2 remain unset. Your previous revision -- which for WW settings used wiphy_apply_custom_regulatory() and *not* regulatory_hint() -- did not have that problem.quoted
quoted
Why are you ignoring SET_BY_DRIVER?Since the notification with NL80211_REGDOM_SET_BY_DRIVER flag might comes from an another chipset's regulatory_hint().Ack. Brian ------Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.