Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 4 authors, 2019-10-31

Re: [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'

From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Date: 2019-10-25 06:58:07
Also in: dri-devel, intel-gfx, linux-crypto, linux-doc, linux-fpga, linux-kselftest, linux-mm, linux-pci, linux-usb, lkml

On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, Jonathan Corbet [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 21:17:17 +0800
Changbin Du [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
The 'functions' directive is not only for functions, but also works for
structs/unions. So the name is misleading. This patch renames it to
'identifiers', which specific the functions/types to be included in
documentation. We keep the old name as an alias of the new one before
all documentation are updated.

Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <redacted>
So I think this is basically OK, but I have one more request...

[...]
quoted
diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
index 1159405cb920..0689f9c37f1e 100644
--- a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
+++ b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
@@ -59,9 +59,10 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
     optional_arguments = 4
     option_spec = {
         'doc': directives.unchanged_required,
-        'functions': directives.unchanged,
         'export': directives.unchanged,
         'internal': directives.unchanged,
+        'identifiers': directives.unchanged,
+        'functions': directives.unchanged,  # alias of 'identifiers'
     }
     has_content = False
 
@@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
 
         filename = env.config.kerneldoc_srctree + '/' + self.arguments[0]
         export_file_patterns = []
+        identifiers = None
 
         # Tell sphinx of the dependency
         env.note_dependency(os.path.abspath(filename))
@@ -86,19 +88,22 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
             export_file_patterns = str(self.options.get('internal')).split()
         elif 'doc' in self.options:
             cmd += ['-function', str(self.options.get('doc'))]
+        elif 'identifiers' in self.options:
+            identifiers = self.options.get('identifiers').split()
         elif 'functions' in self.options:
-            functions = self.options.get('functions').split()
-            if functions:
-                for f in functions:
-                    cmd += ['-function', f]
-            else:
-                cmd += ['-no-doc-sections']
+            identifiers = self.options.get('functions').split()
Rather than do this, can you just change the elif line to read:

    elif ('identifiers' in self.options) or ('functions' in self.options):

...then leave the rest of the code intact?  It keeps the logic together,
and avoids the confusing distinction between identifiers=='' and
identifiers==None .
I think the problem is you still need to distinguish between the two for
the get('functions') part.

One option is to rename 'functions' to 'identifiers' in the above block,
and put something like this above the whole if ladder (untested):

        # backward compat
        if 'functions' in self.options:
            if 'identifiers' in self.options:
                kernellog.warn(env.app, "fail")
            else:
                self.options.set('identifiers', self.options.get('functions'))

BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help