Re: [PATCH] net: wireless: iwlegacy: Fix possible data races in il4965_send_rxon_assoc()
From: Jia-Ju Bai <hidden>
Date: 2018-10-05 13:43:03
Also in:
lkml, netdev
On 2018/10/5 15:54, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 04:52:19PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:quoted
On 2018/10/4 15:59, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:quoted
On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 10:07:45PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:quoted
These possible races are detected by a runtime testing. To fix these races, the mutex lock is used in il4965_send_rxon_assoc() to protect the data.Really ? I'm surprised by that, see below.My runtime testing shows that il4965_send_rxon_assoc() and il4965_configure_filter() are concurrently executed. But after seeing your reply, I need to carefully check whether my runtime testing is right, because I think you are right. In fact, I only monitored the iwl4965 driver, but did not monitor the iwlegacy driver, so I will do the testing again with monitoring the lwlegacy driver.<snip>quoted
quoted
So I wonder how this patch did not cause the deadlock ?Oh, sorry, anyway, my patch will cause double locks...So how those runtime test were performend such you didn't notice this ?
I write a tool to perform runtime testing. This tool records the lock status during driver execution. Some calls to mutex_lock() are in common.c that I did not handle, so the corresponding lock status was not recorded by my tool, causing this false positive. Now I have handled common.c, and this false positive is not reported any more. Actually, I get several new reports. I will send you these reports to you later, and hope you can have a look, thanks in advance :)
quoted
quoted
Anyway what can be done is adding: lockdep_assert_held(&il->mutex); il4965_commit_rxon() to check if we hold the mutex.I agree.Care to post a patch ?
Sure :) Best wishes, Jia-Ju Bai