Re: [PATCH 0/2] workqueue lockdep limitations/bugs

Hi Tejun,

quoted

Let's say we again have an ordered workqueue, and the following:

work1_function
{
	mutex_lock(&mutex);
}

Regular mutexes complain when the locker isn't the unlocker already.
Do we really care about this case?

Oh, sorry for the confusion. I was just eliding the - not very
interesting for this case - unlock. Really I should've typed up a
lock/unlock pair in all of the examples.

johannes