Anilkumar Kolli [off-list ref] writes:

On 2018-04-25 19:33, Kalle Valo wrote:

quoted

Anilkumar Kolli [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

On 2018-04-24 13:32, Kalle Valo wrote:

quoted

Anilkumar Kolli [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Mesh path metric needs txrate information from ieee80211_tx_status()
call but in ath10k there is no mechanism to report tx rate
information
via ieee80211_tx_status(), the rate is only accessible via
sta_statiscs() op.

Per peer stats has tx rate info available, this patch stores per
peer
last tx rate and updates the tx rate info structures in tx
completition.
The rate updated in ieee80211_tx_status() is not exactly for the
last
transmitted frame instead the rate is from one of the previous
frames.

Per peer txrate information is updated through per peer statistics
and is available for QCA9888/QCA9984/QCA4019/QCA998X only

Tested on QCA9984 with firmware-5.bin_10.4-3.5.3-00053
Tested on QCA998X with firmware-5.bin_10.2.4-1.0-00036

Signed-off-by: Anilkumar Kolli <redacted>

BTW, your name in patchwork is "akolli@codeaurora.org" but it
should be
"Anilkumar Kolli" and that's why my script uses the wrong name.
Please
fix it by registering to patchwork as it's possible to change your
name
during registration, but only one time. If that doesn't work then
send a
request to helpdesk@kernel.org and the admins will fix it.

I registered and updated name in the patchwork website.

It seems that your name still is "akolli@codeaurora.org" in the
Submitter field:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10353959/

An example how it should look like:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10359823/

I think you need to contact helpdesk now and ask them to fix it.

quoted

Do I need to resend the patch ?

No need to resend because of this.

Hi Kalle,

Do you have any comments on this RFC. Shall I submit as a patch ?

I have some questions about it but I haven't had a chance to look at in
detail yet, hopefully later this week.

-- 
Kalle Valo