On 05/25/2018 08:30 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:

Sergei Shtylyov [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

On 5/25/2018 2:13 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:

quoted

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <redacted>
---
   drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/cfg80211.c | 6 +++---
   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/cfg80211.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/cfg80211.c
index 2ba8cf3..29e32cd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/cfg80211.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/cfg80211.c

@@ -3898,17 +3898,17 @@ int ath6kl_cfg80211_init(struct ath6kl *ar)
   	wiphy->max_scan_ie_len = 1000; /* FIX: what is correct limit? */
   	switch (ar->hw.cap) {
   	case WMI_11AN_CAP:
-		ht = true;
+		ht = true; /* fall through */
   	case WMI_11A_CAP:
   		band_5gig = true;
   		break;
   	case WMI_11GN_CAP:
-		ht = true;
+		ht = true; /* fall through */
   	case WMI_11G_CAP:
   		band_2gig = true;
   		break;
   	case WMI_11AGN_CAP:
-		ht = true;
+		ht = true; /* fall through */
   	case WMI_11AG_CAP:
   		band_2gig = true;
   		band_5gig = true;

    Hm, typically such comments are done on a line of their own, have
never seen this style...

Yeah, I was wondering the same. Was there a particular reason for this?

Sometimes people use this style for a one-line code block.

I can change it to the traditional style. No problem.

Thanks
--
Gustavo