Hi Brian,

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Norris [mailto:briannorris@chromium.org]
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 12:04 AM
To: Ganapathi Bhat
Cc: Kalle Valo; linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Cathy Luo; Xinming Hu;
Zhiyuan Yang; James Cao; Mangesh Malusare; Shrenik Shikhare
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [2/2] mwifiex: use more_rx_task_flag to avoid USB RX
stall

On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 09:59:04AM +0000, Ganapathi Bhat wrote:

quoted

quoted

I can't find any commit with id c7dbdcb2a4e1, is it correct?

Correct. Actually the commit id c7dbdcb2a4e1 is the PATCH [1/2] sent in this

series.

What? Why would you introduce a bug and only fix it in the next patch?

With the first patch the original issue took considerably longer time to recreate. Also it followed a different path to get recreated(shared in commit message).

Does that mean you should just combine the two?

Let us know if that is fine to merge them. We can modify the commit message accordingly.

Or reverse the order, if patch 2 doesn't cause problems on its own?

Patch 2 has a dependency on patch 1.

Brian

Regards,
Ganapathi