RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] mwifiex: check for mfg_mode in add_virtual_intf
From: Ganapathi Bhat <hidden>
Date: 2017-09-07 20:41:26
Hi Brian,
---------------------------------------------------------------------- On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 12:16:58AM +0530, Ganapathi Bhat wrote:quoted
If driver is loaded with 'mfg_mode' enabled, then the sendingcommandsquoted
are not allowed. So, when mwifiex_send_cmd fails in mwifiex_add_virtual_intf, driver must check for 'mfg_mode' before returning error. Fixes: 7311ea850079 ("mwifiex: fix AP start problem for newly added interface") Signed-off-by: Ganapathi Bhat <redacted> --- drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.cb/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c index ffada17..1856205 100644--- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c@@ -2967,11 +2967,11 @@ struct wireless_dev*mwifiex_add_virtual_intf(struct wiphy *wiphy, ret = mwifiex_send_cmd(priv, HostCmd_CMD_SET_BSS_MODE, HostCmd_ACT_GEN_SET, 0, NULL, true); - if (ret) + if (ret && !adapter->mfg_mode)It doesn't feel like ignoring errors is the best approach here, especially when it's only a single command that we could easily just skip.
Got it.
So, why don't you just skip it, like this?
if (!adapter->mfg_mode) {Yes. This is better.
ret = mwifiex_send_cmd(...); if (ret) goto err_set_bss_mode; }quoted
goto err_set_bss_mode; ret = mwifiex_sta_init_cmd(priv, false, false); - if (ret) + if (ret && !adapter->mfg_mode) goto err_sta_init;Same here; I think it's safe to just completely skip mwifiex_sta_init_cmd(), no?
Yes. I have sent v2 of these changes.
Brianquoted
mwifiex_setup_ht_caps(&wiphy->bands[NL80211_BAND_2GHZ]->ht_cap, priv); -- 1.9.1
Thanks, Ganapathi