RE: [PATCH] ath10k : Fix channel survey dump
From: Venkateswara Naralasettty <hidden>
Date: 2017-05-30 12:01:51
-----Original Message----- From: ath10k [mailto:ath10k-bounces@lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of Venka= teswara Naralasettty Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 8:48 PM To: Kalle Valo <redacted>; nbd@nbd.name Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; ath10k@lists.infradead.org Subject: RE: [PATCH] ath10k : Fix channel survey dump -----Original Message----- From: Kalle Valo Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 2:48 PM To: nbd@nbd.name Cc: Venkateswara Naralasettty <redacted>; ath10k@lists.inf= radead.org; linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k : Fix channel survey dump Felix Fietkau [off-list ref] writes:
On 2017-04-26 16:41, Venkateswara Rao Naralasetty wrote:quoted
Channel active/busy time are showing incorrect (less than previous or=20 sometimes zero) for successive survey dump command. =20 example: Survey data from wlan0 frequency: 5180 MHz [in use] channel active time: 54995 ms channel busy time: 432 ms channel receive time: 0 ms channel transmit time: 59 ms Survey data from wlan0 frequency: 5180 MHz [in use] channel active time: 32592 ms channel busy time: 254 ms channel receive time: 0 ms channel transmit time: 0 ms =20 This patch fix this issue by assigning 'wmi_bss_survey_req_type' as 'WMI_BSS_SURVEY_REQ_TYPE_READ'. =20 Firmware ver 10.4-3.4-00082 Hardware QCA4019 =20 Signed-off-by: Venkateswara Rao Naralasetty=20 [off-list ref] --- drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) =20diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.cb/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c index 9977829..87a9b55 100644--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c@@ -6621,7 +6621,7 @@ static void ath10k_reconfig_complete(struct ieee80=
211_hw *hw,
quoted
struct ieee80211_channel *channel) { int ret; - enum wmi_bss_survey_req_type type =3D WMI_BSS_SURVEY_REQ_TYPE_READ_CLE=
AR;
quoted
+ enum wmi_bss_survey_req_type type =3D WMI_BSS_SURVEY_REQ_TYPE_READ;Does the firmware read the registers directly, or does it accumulate=20 the results in a way that can't overflow? If you don't clear the=20 counters on reset, the overflow will be problematic for the=20 current-channel stats. I think a better approach would be to use=20 READ_CLEAR for in-use channels and store the sum inside the driver.
Venkateswara, any comments? -- Kalle Valo Sorry for the delayed response I held up with some other work. Currently I = am working with firmware team to address your comments. -- Venkatesh.
Firmware is not handling the overflow while accumulating the results, we=
are looking into some other options to make it in host -Venkatesh. _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org BLOCKEDlists[.]infradead[.]org/mailman/listinfo/ath10kBLOCKED