Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2017-02-13

Re: [PATCH - REGRESSION] mwifiex: don't enable/disable IRQ 0 during suspend/resume

From: Kalle Valo <hidden>
Date: 2017-02-13 15:31:50
Also in: lkml

Brian Norris [off-list ref] writes:
If we don't have an out-of-band wakeup IRQ configured through DT (as
most platforms don't), then we fall out of this function with
'irq_wakeup == 0'. Other code (e.g., mwifiex_disable_wake() and
mwifiex_enable_wake()) treats 'irq_wakeup >= 0' as a valid IRQ, and so
we end up calling {enable,disable}_irq() on IRQ 0.

That seems bad, so let's not do that.

Same problem as fixed in this patch:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9531693/
[PATCH v2 2/3] btmrvl: set irq_bt to -1 when failed to parse it

with the difference that:
(a) this one is actually a regression and
(b) this affects both device tree and non-device-tree systems

While fixing the regression, also drop the verbosity on the parse
failure, so we don't see this when a DT node is present but doesn't have
an interrupt property (this is perfectly legal):

[   21.999000] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: fail to parse irq_wakeup from device tree

Fixes: 853402a00823 ("mwifiex: Enable WoWLAN for both sdio and pcie")
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
---
This is a 4.10 regression. Not sure if it's critical to push quickly, or if it
should just be tagged -stable and pushed in 4.11.
It's really late for 4.10, so I would rather push it to 4.11.

-- 
Kalle Valo
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help