On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 06:58:45AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
quoted
The frequency ranges have been "rounded down" to conform with the
apparent convention of only including ranges used by standard 802.11
channels, rather than using the actual frequency ranges as has been
done for some countries (and most 60GHz rules). My preference is the
latter so that there is a clear correlation between the regdb and
relevant documentation, and so that the regdb may become useful
beyond 802.11. With your blessing as maintainer I will also make this
change to the patch.
I think that's just an artifact of the original database source and
would also prefer the documented ranges to be used.
Yes, I prefer the documented ranges as well.
Thanks,
Seth