Re: [PATCH] ath10k: merge extended peer info data with existing peers info
From: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>
Date: 2016-12-19 18:37:22
Hello Shafi, On Monday, December 19, 2016 10:19:57 PM CET Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan wrote:
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 06:46:34PM +0100, Christian Lamparter wrote:quoted
The 10.4 firmware adds extended peer information to the firmware's statistics payload. This additional info is stored as a separate data field. During review of "ath10k: add accounting for the extended peer statistics" [0] Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan commented that the extended peer statistics lists are of little use:"... there is not much use in appending the extended peer stats (which gets periodically updated) to the linked list '&ar->debug.fw_stats.peers_extd)' and should we get rid of the below (and the required cleanup as well) list_splice_tail_init(&stats.peers_extd, &ar->debug.fw_stats.peers_extd); since rx_duration is getting updated periodically to the per sta information." This patch replaces the extended peers list with a lookup and puts the retrieved data (rx_duration) into the existing ath10k_fw_stats_peer entry that was created earlier.[shafi] Its good to maintain the extended stats variable and retain the two different functions to update rx_duration. a) extended peer stats supported - mainly for 10.4 b) extender peer stats not supported - for 10.2
Well, I have to ask why you want to retain the two different functions to update the same arsta->rx_duration? I think a little bit of code that helps to explain what's on your mind (or how you would do it) would help immensely in this case. Since I have the feeling that this is the problem here. So please explain it in C(lang).
quoted
[0] <https://lkml.kernel.org/r/992a4e2676037a06f482cdbe2d3d39e287530be5.1480974623.git.chunkeey@googlemail.com> Cc: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan <redacted> Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com> --- drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h | 2 -- drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/debug.c | 17 -------------- drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/debugfs_sta.c | 32 ++----------------------- drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++------- 4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h index 09ff8b8a6441..3fffbbb18c25 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h@@ -268,11 +268,9 @@ struct ath10k_fw_stats_pdev { }; struct ath10k_fw_stats { - bool extended; struct list_head pdevs; struct list_head vdevs; struct list_head peers; - struct list_head peers_extd; }; #define ATH10K_TPC_TABLE_TYPE_FLAG 1diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/debug.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/debug.c index 82a4c67f3672..89f7fde77cdf 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/debug.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/debug.c@@ -315,25 +315,13 @@ static void ath10k_fw_stats_peers_free(struct list_head *head) } } -static void ath10k_fw_extd_stats_peers_free(struct list_head *head) -{ - struct ath10k_fw_extd_stats_peer *i, *tmp; - - list_for_each_entry_safe(i, tmp, head, list) { - list_del(&i->list); - kfree(i); - } -} - static void ath10k_debug_fw_stats_reset(struct ath10k *ar) { spin_lock_bh(&ar->data_lock); ar->debug.fw_stats_done = false; - ar->debug.fw_stats.extended = false;[shafi] this looks fine, but not removing the 'extended' variable from ath10k_fw_stats structure, I see the design for 'rx_duration' arguably some what convoluted !
I removed extended because it is now a write-only variable. So I figured, there's no point in keeping it around? I don't have access to the firmware interface documentation, so I don't know if there's a reason why it would be good to have it later. So please tell me, what information do we gain from it?
*We get periodic events from firmware updating 'ath10k_debug_fw_stats_process'
*Fetch rx_duration from 'ath10k_wmi_pull_fw_stats(ar, skb, &stats)'
{certainly 'stats' object is for this particular update only, and freed
up later)
*Update immediately using 'ath10k_sta_update_rx_duration'
'ath10k_wmi_pull_fw_stats' has a slightly different implementation
for 10.2 and 10.4 (the later supporting extended peer stats)I see that 10.2.4's ath10k_wmi_10_2_4_op_pull_fw_stats() passes the rx_duration as part of the wmi_10_2_4_ext_peer_stats element which is basically a carbon-copy of wmi_10_2_4_peer_stats (but with one extra __le32 for the rx_duration at the end.) This rx_duration is then used to set the rx_duration field in the generated ath10k_fw_stats_peer struct. 10.4's ath10k_wmi_10_4_op_pull_fw_stats() has a "fixed" wmi_10_4_peer_stats element and uses an separate "fixed" wmi_10_4_peer_extd_stats element for the communicating the rx_duration to the driver. Thing is, both function have the same signature. They produce the same struct ath10k_fw_stats_peer for the given data in the sk_buff input. So why does 10.4 need to have it's peer_extd infrastructure, when it can use the existing rx_duration field in the *universal* ath10k_fw_stats_peer? What's with the extra layers / HAL here? Because it looks like it's merged back together in the same manner into the same arsta->rx_duration? [ath10k_sta_update_stats_rx_duration() vs. ath10k_sta_update_extd_stats_rx_duration() - they are almost carbon copies too]
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c index c893314a191f..c7ec7b9e9b55 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c@@ -3044,23 +3044,41 @@ static int ath10k_wmi_10_4_op_pull_fw_stats(struct ath10k *ar, if ((stats_id & WMI_10_4_STAT_PEER_EXTD) == 0) return 0; - stats->extended = true; - for (i = 0; i < num_peer_stats; i++) { const struct wmi_10_4_peer_extd_stats *src; - struct ath10k_fw_extd_stats_peer *dst; + struct ath10k_fw_stats_peer *dst; src = (void *)skb->data; if (!skb_pull(skb, sizeof(*src))) return -EPROTO; - dst = kzalloc(sizeof(*dst), GFP_ATOMIC); - if (!dst) - continue; + /* Because the stat data may exceed htc-wmi buffer + * limit the firmware might split the stats data + * and delivers it in multiple update events. + * if we can't find the entry in the current event + * payload, we have to look in main list as well. + */ + list_for_each_entry(dst, &stats->peers, list) { + if (ether_addr_equal(dst->peer_macaddr, + src->peer_macaddr.addr)) + goto found; + } + +#ifdef CONFIG_ATH10K_DEBUGFS + list_for_each_entry(dst, &ar->debug.fw_stats.peers, list) { + if (ether_addr_equal(dst->peer_macaddr, + src->peer_macaddr.addr)) + goto found; + } +#endif + + ath10k_dbg(ar, ATH10K_DBG_WMI, + "Orphaned extended stats entry for station %pM.\n", + src->peer_macaddr.addr); + continue; - ether_addr_copy(dst->peer_macaddr, src->peer_macaddr.addr); +found: dst->rx_duration = __le32_to_cpu(src->rx_duration); - list_add_tail(&dst->list, &stats->peers_extd); } return 0;[shafi] Yes i am bit concerned about this change making 10.4 to update over the existing peer_stats structure, the idea is to maintain uniformity between the structures shared between ath10k and its corresponding to avoid confusion/ bugs in the future. Kindly let me know your thoughts, feel free to correct me if any of my analysis is incorrect. thank you !
Isn't the point of the ath10k_wmi_10_*_op_pull_fw_stats() functions to make a "universal" statistic (in your case a unified ath10k_fw_stats_peer structure) that other functions can use, without caring about if the FW was 10.4 or 10.2.4? There's no indication that the rx_duration field in wmi_10_2_4_ext_peer_stats conveys any different information than the rx_duration in wmi_10_4_peer_extd_stats. So, what's going on here? Can't you just make wmi_10_4_peer_extd_stats's rx_duration use the existing field in ath10k_fw_stats_peer? And if not: why exactly? Regards, Christian