Re: ath9k ARMv7 OOPS in v4.8.6, v4.2.8
From: Jason Cooper <hidden>
Date: 2016-11-23 21:40:53
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 09:17:45PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 08:59:17PM +0000, Jason Cooper wrote:quoted
As requested on irc:Thanks.quoted
7f0: ea000002 b 800 <ath_cmn_process_fft+0xac> 7f4: e7970102 ldr r0, [r7, r2, lsl #2] 7f8: ebfffffe bl 0 <relay_buf_full> 7fc: e0844000 add r4, r4, r0 800: e300a000 movw sl, #0 804: e28b2001 add r2, fp, #1 808: e340a000 movt sl, #0 80c: e3a01004 mov r1, #4 810: e1a0000a mov r0, sl 814: ebfffffe bl 0 <_find_next_bit_le> 818: e5953000 ldr r3, [r5] 81c: e1500003 cmp r0, r3 820: e1a0b000 mov fp, r0 824: e2802008 add r2, r0, #8 828: bafffff1 blt 7f4 <ath_cmn_process_fft+0xa0>Okay, so i was 0, so running UP probably isn't going to help. r7 is also spec_priv->rfs_chan_spec_scan. So, I think the question is... how is this NULL - and has it always been NULL...
The problem appears to be that ath_cmn_process_fft() isn't called that often. When it is, it crashes in ath_cmn_is_fft_buf_full() because spec_priv->rfs_chan_spec_scan is NULL when ATH9K_DEBUGFS=n. :-( I'm running with ATH9K_DEBUGFS=y now. If it goes a couple of days without crashing, I'll gin up a patch. thx, Jason.