RE: mwifiex: PCIe8997 chip specific handling
From: Amitkumar Karwar <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-10 20:26:27
Also in:
lkml
Hi Brian,
From: Brian Norris [mailto:briannorris@chromium.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 12:14 AM To: Amitkumar Karwar Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Cathy Luo; Nishant Sarmukadam; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: mwifiex: PCIe8997 chip specific handling Hi, On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 04:08:51PM +0530, Amitkumar Karwar wrote:quoted
The patch corrects the revision id register and uses it along with magic value and chip version registers to download appropriate firmware image. PCIe8997 Z chipset variant code has been removed, as it won't be used in production. Signed-off-by: Amitkumar Karwar <redacted> --- drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.c | 35 ++++++++++------------------- drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.h | 14 +++++------- 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)[...]quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.hb/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.h index f6992f0..46f99ca 100644--- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.h +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.h@@ -32,12 +32,9 @@ #define PCIE8897_DEFAULT_FW_NAME "mrvl/pcie8897_uapsta.bin" #define PCIE8897_A0_FW_NAME "mrvl/pcie8897_uapsta_a0.bin" #define PCIE8897_B0_FW_NAME "mrvl/pcie8897_uapsta.bin" -#define PCIE8997_DEFAULT_FW_NAME "mrvl/pcieusb8997_combo_v2.bin" -#define PCIEUART8997_FW_NAME_Z "mrvl/pcieuart8997_combo.bin" -#define PCIEUART8997_FW_NAME_V2 "mrvl/pcieuart8997_combo_v2.bin" -#define PCIEUSB8997_FW_NAME_Z "mrvl/pcieusb8997_combo.bin" -#define PCIEUSB8997_FW_NAME_V2 "mrvl/pcieusb8997_combo_v2.bin" -#define PCIE8997_DEFAULT_WIFIFW_NAME "mrvl/pcie8997_wlan.bin" +#define PCIEUART8997_FW_NAME_V4 "mrvl/pcieuart8997_combo_v4.bin" +#define PCIEUSB8997_FW_NAME_V4 "mrvl/pcieusb8997_combo_v4.bin" +#define PCIE8997_DEFAULT_WIFIFW_NAME "mrvl/pcie8997_wlan_v4.bin"Why do version bumps require firmware renames? Is this just to make sure you don't load the new firmware on old chip revs that you don't plan to support for production (i.e., only early revs like the _Z you're dropping)? This doesn't seems like a good long-term solution, at least once you start getting this silicon out in the wild. At some point, I'd expect to see a stable file name. Brian
We haven't yet submitted any firmware image upstream for 8997 chipset. pcieuart8997_combo_v4.bin/pcieusb8997_combo_v4.bin would be our firmware candidate for upstream submission. The filename would remain same hereafter. pcie*8997_combo_v2.bin had support only for A0 chipset pcie*8997_combo_v3.bin was our internal development version which had support for A1 chipset pcie*8997_combo_v4.bin has support for both A0 and A1 chipsets and this is the version that shall be released to customers/upstream from now on. Regards, Amitkumar Karwar