Martin Blumenstingl [off-list ref] writes:
quoted hunk
Add documentation how devicetree can be used to configure ath9k based
devices.
Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qca,ath9k.txt | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 59 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qca,ath9k.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qca,ath9k.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qca,ath9k.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7c62c59
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qca,ath9k.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+* Qualcomm Atheros ath9k wireless devices
+
+This node provides properties for configuring the ath9k wireless device. The
+node is expected to be specified as a child node of the PCI controller to
+which the wireless chip is connected.
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible: Should be "qca,ath9k"
Isn't this supposed to use the chipset name? ath9k is the driver name
and something like ar9462 is the chip name. I know in ath10k we used
"qca,ath10k" but I'm starting to suspect that was a mistake.
--
Kalle Valo