(Fixing top posting)

"Pan, Miaoqing" [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

quoted

--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/reg.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/reg.h

@@ -1122,8 +1122,8 @@ enum {
  #define AR9300_NUM_GPIO                          16
  #define AR9330_NUM_GPIO                                 16
  #define AR9340_NUM_GPIO                                 23
-#define AR9462_NUM_GPIO                                 10
-#define AR9485_NUM_GPIO                                 12
+#define AR9462_NUM_GPIO                                 14
+#define AR9485_NUM_GPIO                                 11
  #define AR9531_NUM_GPIO                                 18
  #define AR9550_NUM_GPIO                                 24
  #define AR9561_NUM_GPIO                                 23

@@ -1139,8 +1139,8 @@ enum {
  #define AR9300_GPIO_MASK                        0x0000F4FF
  #define AR9330_GPIO_MASK                        0x0000F4FF
  #define AR9340_GPIO_MASK                        0x0000000F
-#define AR9462_GPIO_MASK                        0x000003FF
-#define AR9485_GPIO_MASK                        0x00000FFF
+#define AR9462_GPIO_MASK                        0x00003FFF
+#define AR9485_GPIO_MASK                        0x000007FF
  #define AR9531_GPIO_MASK                        0x0000000F
  #define AR9550_GPIO_MASK                        0x0000000F
  #define AR9561_GPIO_MASK                        0x0000000F

solves the problem.

Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>

Done, https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9151847/

But the patch 9151847 is different from what Sudip tested above? Why?

And if you modify something _after_ the reporter has tested the patch
clearly document what you changed and why. I do not want find hidden
changes like this, even more so when the patch is going to a 4.7-rc
release.

Sudip, could you also test patch 9151847, please? You can download the
patch from the patchwork link above.

-- 
Kalle Valo