On 04/20/2016 11:11 PM, Christian Lamparter wrote:

On Wednesday, April 20, 2016 10:59:44 AM Kalle Valo wrote:

quoted

Christian Lamparter [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

On Monday, April 18, 2016 07:42:05 PM Kalle Valo wrote:

quoted

Christian Lamparter [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

On Monday, April 18, 2016 06:45:09 PM Kalle Valo wrote:

quoted

Why even mention anything about a "special firmware" as the firmware is
already available from linux-firmware.git? 

Yes and no. 1.9.6 is in linux-firmware.git. I've tried to add 1.9.9 too
but that failed.
<http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/114639>

Rick's comment makes sense to me, better just to provide the latest
version. No need to unnecessary confuse the users. And if someone really
wants to use an older version that she can retrieve it from the git
history.

Part of the fun here is that firmware is GPLv2. The linux-firmware.git has
to point to or add the firmware source to their tree. They have added every
single source file to it.... instead of "packaging" it in a tar.bz2/gz/xz
like you normally do for release sources.

If you want to read more about it:
<http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg101868.html>

Yeah, that's more work. I get that. But I'm still not understanding
what's the actual problem which prevents us from updating carl9170
firmware in linux-firmware.

I'm not sure, but why not ask? I've added the cc'ed Linux Firmware
Maintainers. So for those people reading the fw list:

What would it take to update the carl9170-1.fw firmware file in your
repository to the latest version?

Who has to sent the firmware update. Does it have to be the person who
sent the first request? (Xose)? The maintainer of the firmware (me)?
someone from Qualcomm Atheros? Or someone else (specific)? (the 
firmware is licensed as GPLv2 - in theory anyone should be able to
do that)

How should the firmware source update be handled? Currently the latest
.tar.xz of the firmware has ~130kb. The formated patches from 1.9.6 to
latest are about ~100kb (182 individual patches).

How does linux-firmware handle new binary firmware images and new 
sources? What if carl9170fw-2.bin is added. Do we need another
source directory for this in the current tree then? Because 
carl9170fw-1.bin will still be needed for backwards compatibility
so we basically need to duplicate parts of the source?

Also, how's the situation with ath9k_htc? The 1.4.0 image contains
some GPLv2 code as well? So, why is there no source in the tree, but 
just the link to it? Because, I would like to do basically the same
for carl9170fw and just add a link to the carl9170fw repository and
save everyone this source update "song and dance".

Hi Ben, could you assist Christian ?

-thanks-