On Fri, 2016-04-29 at 09:26 +1000, Julian Calaby wrote:
quoted
+
+# Silence some warnings for now. Needs to be fixed upstream.
b/26105799
Comments like this worry me: who is being referred to as "upstream",
what are these warnings and why has nobody fixed them?
It's funny, because we're upstream (the kernel.org iw repository I
maintain) and they're submitting a Makefile to the same upstream -
saying that "upstream" should fix warnings.
In reality, it's a deluded comment - the warnings from -Wunused-
parameter are entirely useless and cannot be fixed without cluttering
the code with __maybe_unused (or so) since the functions implement
APIs.
This alone is a reason to reject this patch.
If there are legitimate warnings, submit patches first to fix them (and
perhaps add the relevant warning to the real Makefile).
If I then reject those "fixes", don't put such a baselessly accusatory
comment into the Makefile.
johannes