Thread (27 messages) read the whole thread 27 messages, 5 authors, 2016-02-16

Re: [PATCH 8/9] rfkill: Userspace control for airplane mode

From: João Paulo Rechi Vita <jprvita@gmail.com>
Date: 2016-02-08 17:38:24
Also in: linux-api, lkml, netdev, platform-driver-x86

On 8 February 2016 at 11:11, Dan Williams [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 10:41 -0500, João Paulo Rechi Vita wrote:
quoted
Provide an interface for the airplane-mode indicator be controlled
from
userspace. User has to first acquire the control through
RFKILL_OP_AIRPLANE_MODE_ACQUIRE and keep the fd open for the whole
time
it wants to be in control of the indicator. Closing the fd or using
RFKILL_OP_AIRPLANE_MODE_RELEASE restores the default policy.

To change state of the indicator, the RFKILL_OP_AIRPLANE_MODE_CHANGE
operation is used, passing the value on "struct rfkill_event.soft".
If
the caller has not acquired the airplane-mode control beforehand, the
operation fails.
I'd like to clarify a bit, so tell me if I'm correct or not.  Using
RFKILL_OP_AIRPLANE_MODE_CHANGE does not actually change any device
state. It's just an indicator with no relationship to any of the
registered rfkill switches, right?
Yes, that's correct, and it is the intended behavior.
I wonder if setting RFKILL_OP_AIRPLANE_MODE_CHANGE(true) shouldn't also
softblock all switches, otherwise you can set airplane mode all day
long with RFKILL_OP_AIRPLANE_MODE_CHANGE and it doesn't actually enable
airplane mode at all?
The idea behind it is to just provide the mechanism for userspace to
decide what exactly being in airplane mode means, so it would
set/unset the indicator in the right moment.

--
João Paulo Rechi Vita
http://about.me/jprvita
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help