Re: [PATCH] wireless-regdb: add 2.4GHz regulatory rules for Cuba (CU)
From: Xose Vazquez Perez <hidden>
Date: 2016-01-27 09:58:02
Also in:
wireless-regdb
On 09/08/2015 04:22 PM, Seth Forshee wrote:
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 03:59:38PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:quoted
On 08/13/2015 04:31 PM, Seth Forshee wrote:quoted
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 03:29:55PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:quoted
Resolución 127, 2011 - Reglamento Banda 2,4 GHz.: http://www.mincom.gob.cu/sites/default/files/marcoregulatorio/R%20127-11%20Reglamento%20banda%202,4%20GHz.pdf Cc: Seth Forshee <redacted> Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Cc: wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by: Xose Vazquez Perez <redacted> --- db.txt | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt index 982db34..2edbf90 100644 --- a/db.txt +++ b/db.txt@@ -275,6 +275,13 @@ country CR: DFS-FCC (5490 - 5730 @ 20), (24), DFS (5735 - 5835 @ 20), (30) +# http://www.mincom.gob.cu/?q=marcoregulatorio +# - Redes Informáticas +# Resolución 127, 2011 - Reglamento Banda 2,4 GHz. +country CU: DFS-FCC + (2400 - 2456 @ 40), (200 mW) + (2456 - 2483.5 @ 40), (200 mW) +Based on the Google translation of the document you linked to, I don't see anything which would prevent merging these rules into one rule. Am I missing something?from http://www.mincom.gob.cu/sites/default/files/marcoregulatorio/R%20127-11%20Reglamento%20banda%202,4%20GHz.pdf page 7: Artículo 4: Disposiciones de carácter técnico [..] 4.3.- No obstante lo anterior, los equipos que operen en las frecuencias entre 2456 y 2483,5 MHz pueden emplear valores de p.i.r.e superiores, cuando ello se justifique en beneficio de objetivos de interés nacional [...] 4.4.- Para estos casos es necesario obtener una autorización expresa de la Agencia [...] If you grant an authorization, for 2456-2483.5 pire can be increased.Okay, but for the purposes of this database that provision isn't going to apply, and it seems you agree since you've listed both as having the exact same power limit. So I'd still prefer that we make it a single rule.
OK. Done in v2. -thanks-