RE: [PATCH net-next] wireless: test sscanf return values
From: David Laight <hidden>
Date: 2015-02-27 10:36:11
Also in:
lkml, netdev
From: David Laight <hidden>
Date: 2015-02-27 10:36:11
Also in:
lkml, netdev
From: Joe Perches
At some point, it'd be good to make sscanf use __must_check so make sure the net/ uses of sscanf use the return value.
Isn't it much safer to avoid sscanf() completely and use a different function for converting numerics? David