Re: [PATCH] Revert "cfg80211: make WEXT compatibility unselectable"
From: Andreas Hartmann <hidden>
Date: 2015-01-01 10:58:55
Also in:
lkml
From: Andreas Hartmann <hidden>
Date: 2015-01-01 10:58:55
Also in:
lkml
Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 12/31/14 16:14, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
[...]
quoted
All in all: If you want to get rid of wext, you still have to go a *very* long way to get the same *stable* and high throughput quality with *all* chips depending on mac80211 and not just a few flagship drivers like Atheros.Hi Andreas, That's a nice list of unrelated stuff. This has all nothing to do with WEXT. Actually, you can build rt5572sta with cfg80211 support (RT_CFG80211_SUPPORT).
You seem to know sources I don't know off. Could you please tell me, where to find them? I have DPO_RT5572_LinuxSTA_2.6.0.1_20120629 which doesn't compile with HAS_CFG80211_SUPPORT=y because -DCONFIG_AP_SUPPORT, on which RT_CFG80211_SUPPORT relies, is broken. DPO_RT5572_LinuxSTA_2.6.1.3_20121022 removed the necessary broken AP code completely.
This thread is about the configuration API and not about driver performance.
I know. I tried to show, why WEXT as a whole is still necessary even if there is a mac80211 based driver, because of the weakness of rt2800usb: Nip it in the bud. Kind regards, Andreas