On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 09:56:46AM -0500, Nate Carlson wrote:

On Tue, 29 Jul 2014, Larry Finger wrote:

quoted

You should try the experimental firmware file from
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/egrumbach/linux-firmware.git/plain/iwlwifi-7260-9.ucode?h=Core6.

I am currently testing it and getting throughput of 60 Mbps on the 2.4 GHz band,
and 90 Mbps at 5 GHz.

I'm getting 1...5 Mbs with 7260 AC (Thinkpad Yoga) in 2.4 GHz band
in the office (11n AP), more decent speed at home.
I'm about 5m away from the AP.  A tiny Ralink rt2800usb dongle in the
same machine gives solid performance (40...60 Mbs).

The experimental firmware didn't make a difference for me, except
it seems to fix /sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy0/iwlwifi/iwlmvm/fw_rx_stats
(previously all values were 0, but I don't know how to interpret them).

For what it's worth - on both this experimental firmware and previous
revisions, I can do > 200Mbps to the public internet (on my office internet
connection), with 13 other users currently on the same AP as me (the APs are
Cisco 3702i's managed by a Cisco 2504.) This is (obviously) on the 5ghz
band, with VHT enabled. I've had issues with occasional 'dropouts' with this
card, where traffic will randomly stop passing and/or ping times will jump
to > 10s; sometimes it clears up on its own, somethings I have to
re-associate to the AP to get it to stop. I'm hoping the new firmware and/or
the newest Cisco WLC build fixes it; testing now.

Borislav - you didn't mention what firmware revision you are running; if you
aren't on one of the -9 builds, I'd highly recommend moving to it.

I do have the following set in
/etc/modprobe.d/iwlwifi-disable-powersave.conf:
"options iwlwifi power_save=0 bt_coex_active=0"

I also tried iwlmvm option power_scheme=1 (Continuously Active Mode),
11n_disable=1, and "iw dev wlan0 set power_save off".  It stays slow,
and typing in ssh is still somewhat laggy.

Once I move to 3.16, I'll probably try turning both of those features back
on, and see what happens.

Here's a speedtest result; I've gotten better, but this is representative of
my average speeds:
http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/3655207245

In any case - this card _is_ capable of decent speeds for sure!

The question is how to go about testing.  ISTR the Windows 8 driver
didn't have any issue and gave decent speed, but I don't have the
time to restore the Windows image for testing now.  If Windows
and Linux use the same firmware I guess a comparison would
reveal if it's a driver of firmware issue.

Otherwise I'm hoping Intel guys could provide some guidance for
testing so we could find the root cause.


Johannes