Re: [PATCH] net: wireless: rtlwifi: rtl8192de: hw.c: Cleaning up conjunction always evaluates to false

On Tuesday 10 June 2014 23:31:37 Rickard Strandqvist wrote:

I guess it's ok to do the patches?

Right, you got some feedback from me and another person. You can
send patches whenever you like.

But then again, I will then send them one by one, with the cover
letter? +35 email?

Have you seen my other reply? Use git-format-patch --cover-letter.
Why would you need 35 mails? A commit should logically group a
change per driver. So, one commit probably touches rtlXXXX/reg.h
and rtlXXXX/hw.c (perhaps others? grep for it!)

Be sure to manually check each change. Your last patchset included
non-sensial commit messages and subjects.

Then the macro I should add in all the:

net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl****se/reg.h


And in the:
drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/include/rtl8188e_spec.h
drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_hw.h
drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_wlan_sme.h
drivers/staging/rtl8723au/include/rtl8723a_spec.h
drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/rtl8821ae/reg.h

The staging drivers will be taken by Greg KH, see MAINTAINERS
for the addresses for staging drivers.

And should I put it like:
#define MSR_MASK 0x03

Or is this more accurate:
#define MSR_MASK   (MSR_INFRA | MSR_ADHOC)

Since the integer resulting from the mask is a decimal sequence rather
than a bitmap, it makes more sense to use 0x03 instead. Please have a
look at the drivers and be sure to understand why the changes are needed.

Peter

PS. please do not top-post. For driver discussions, you should keep
the list cc'd too. That makes it more likely for someone to respond to
such queries.