Re: [PATCH 1/6] ux500: convert struct spinlock to spinlock_t
From: Linus Walleij <hidden>
Date: 2012-12-01 18:11:16
Also in:
dri-devel, intel-gfx, linux-arm-kernel, linux-media, lkml
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez [off-list ref] wrote:
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <redacted>
spinlock_t should always be used.
I was unable to build test with allmodconfig:
mcgrof@frijol ~/linux-next (git::(no branch))$ make C=1 M=drivers/crypto/ux500/
WARNING: Symbol version dump /home/mcgrof/linux-next/Module.symvers
is missing; modules will have no dependencies and modversions.
LD drivers/crypto/ux500/built-in.o
Building modules, stage 2.
MODPOST 0 modules
Cc: Srinidhi Kasagar <redacted>
Cc: Linus Walleij <redacted>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Reported-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <redacted>Looks correct to me. Acked-by: Linus Walleij <redacted> Yours, Linus Walleij