On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 14:19 +0200, Eyal Shapira wrote:

On 5 December 2012 13:21, Luciano Coelho [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

IMO it would have been nicer to keep the existing ones as they are and
not change the semantics.  Then add the new ones with another name.
Maybe something like "max_dwell_time_active_long", which is more
generic.

It is possible that we will find more scenarios where this long scans
could be used (eg. if it would be possible to identify whether there are
any low latency TIDs running or not).

Sure. I'll respin it.

Thanks a lot, dude! :)

--
Luca.