Hey guys, this should work now.
--
--- main.c 2012-07-21 20:58:29.000000000 +0000
+++ mainnew.c 2012-08-05 20:00:37.000000000 +0000
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
#include "led.h"
#include "cfg.h"
#include "debugfs.h"
-
+#include "net/rfkill/rfkill.h"
static struct lock_class_key ieee80211_rx_skb_queue_class;
void ieee80211_configure_filter(struct ieee80211_local *local)
@@ -183,6 +183,7 @@
*
*/
/* WARN_ON(ret); */
+ WARN_ON(1)
}
return ret;
--
Thanks,
--
Christopher
P.S. Copy betwwen the two dashed lines.
Hi Christopher,
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Christopher Sacchi
[off-list ref] wrote:
Hey guys, this should work now.
I see the changes you made, however you're not going to get them
accepted in this format.
See Documentation/SubmittingPatches
Online here: https://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-testing.git;a=blob;f=Documentation/SubmittingPatches;h=c379a2a6949f1c1cac04fb6f185c633512f37061;hb=HEAD
quoted hunk
--
--- main.c 2012-07-21 20:58:29.000000000 +0000
+++ mainnew.c 2012-08-05 20:00:37.000000000 +0000
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
#include "led.h"
#include "cfg.h"
#include "debugfs.h"
-
Why are you removing the blank line - it's required as part of the
kernel coding style.
+#include "net/rfkill/rfkill.h"
You don't seem to actually be adding any code that uses anything in
this header and don't explain why it's needed.
quoted hunk
static struct lock_class_key ieee80211_rx_skb_queue_class;
void ieee80211_configure_filter(struct ieee80211_local *local)
@@ -183,6 +183,7 @@
*
*/
/* WARN_ON(ret); */
+ WARN_ON(1)
What bug is this fixing? What problem is this solving?
Thanks,
--
Julian Calaby
Email: julian.calaby@gmail.com
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/
.Plan: http://sites.google.com/site/juliancalaby/