Re: assert_cfg80211_lock warning with Linux v3.5-8833-g2d53492
From: Seth Forshee <hidden>
Date: 2012-08-01 17:56:39
Also in:
netdev
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 07:14:45PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 11:19 -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:quoted
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 05:53:58PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:quoted
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 17:51 +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote:quoted
On 08/01/2012 05:38 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:quoted
quoted
brcmsmac needs to hold cfg80211_mutex before calling freq_reg_info...quoted
It looks like those calls were added in mid-June.I think mid-june sounds about right. We never observed the warning when changes to use regulatory infrastructure were tested/reviewed. Should this precondition be mentioned in cfg80211.h? Gr. AvSDiving in further it seems brcmsmac can not grab the cfg80211_mutex. So another solution is needed.Yeah I was going to say -- how can it possibly access that? It seems that in some patch the API got broken, it should be taking the lock or whatever ... I'll leave it to Luis to sort out though :-PIn other drivers freq_reg_info only seems to get used by the regulatory notifiers, which get called with the lock held. brcmsmac is wanting to know whether or not OFDM is allowed when setting the channel though, and I didn't find that information anywhere outside the regulatory information. If there's another way then calling freq_reg_info() could be avoided. Or maybe we could add an OFDM flag to the channel information?Seems reasonable to add the flags (or some of them) to the channel flags, yeah.
Great, I'll work something up. Seth