Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] brcm80211: smac: enable/disable radio on regulatory updates

[PATCH v2 0/9] brcm80211: smac: rework regulatory support · Seth Forshee <hidden> · 2012-06-05
[PATCH v2 1/9] brcm80211: smac: don't set up tx power limits during initialization · Seth Forshee <hidden> · 2012-06-05
[PATCH v2 2/9] brcm80211: smac: always set channel specified by mac80211 · Seth Forshee <hidden> · 2012-06-05
[PATCH v2 3/9] brcm80211: smac: remove unused code for 40MHz channels · Seth Forshee <hidden> · 2012-06-05
Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] brcm80211: smac: remove unused code for 40MHz channels · Seth Forshee <hidden> · 2012-06-13
Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] brcm80211: smac: remove unused code for 40MHz channels · Arend van Spriel <hidden> · 2012-06-13
[PATCH v2 4/9] brcm80211: smac: clean up channel.c · Seth Forshee <hidden> · 2012-06-05
[PATCH v2 5/9] brcm80211: smac: inform mac80211 of the X2 regulatory domain · Seth Forshee <hidden> · 2012-06-05
[PATCH v2 6/9] brcm80211: smac: enable/disable radio on regulatory updates · Seth Forshee <hidden> · 2012-06-05
Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] brcm80211: smac: enable/disable radio on regulatory updates · Arend van Spriel <hidden> · 2012-06-13
Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] brcm80211: smac: enable/disable radio on regulatory updates · Seth Forshee <hidden> · 2012-06-13
Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] brcm80211: smac: enable/disable radio on regulatory updates · Arend van Spriel <hidden> · 2012-06-13
[PATCH v2 7/9] brcm80211: smac: use mac80211 channel data for tx power limits · Seth Forshee <hidden> · 2012-06-05
Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] brcm80211: smac: use mac80211 channel data for tx power limits · Arend van Spriel <hidden> · 2012-06-13
Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] brcm80211: smac: use mac80211 channel data for tx power limits · Seth Forshee <hidden> · 2012-06-13
Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] brcm80211: smac: use mac80211 channel data for tx power limits · Arend van Spriel <hidden> · 2012-06-13
[PATCH v2 8/9] brcm80211: smac: don't validate channels against internal regulatory data · Seth Forshee <hidden> · 2012-06-05
[PATCH v2 9/9] brcm80211: smac: use current regulatory domain when checking whether OFDM is allowed · Seth Forshee <hidden> · 2012-06-05
Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] brcm80211: smac: rework regulatory support · Seth Forshee <hidden> · 2012-06-12
Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] brcm80211: smac: rework regulatory support · Arend van Spriel <hidden> · 2012-06-13
Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] brcm80211: smac: rework regulatory support · Seth Forshee <hidden> · 2012-06-13
Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] brcm80211: smac: rework regulatory support · Arend van Spriel <hidden> · 2012-06-16

From: Arend van Spriel <hidden>
Date: 2012-06-13 14:26:28

On 06/13/2012 03:43 PM, Seth Forshee wrote:

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:28:39AM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote:

quoted

When we were having fun in staging GregKH indicated that use of likely()
should be justified with profiling data. Probably not really needed here.

Okay, I'll remove it. This isn't performance critical code anyhow.

That was my (un)educated guess as well. Thanks.

Gr. AvS

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help