2012/6/30 Hauke Mehrtens [off-list ref]:

On 06/29/2012 02:10 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:

quoted

Having bus number printed makes it much easier to anaylze logs on
systems with more buses. For example Netgear WNDR4500 has 3 AMBA buses
in total, which makes standard log really messy.

Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
---
V2: don't create "bus" variable when it's not really helpful
don't brak strings

John: this applies on top of 5 patches accepted in the
[PATCH 0/8] bcma misc updates
patchset.

So:
wireless-testing +
      bcma: extend workaround for bcm4331
      bcma: add constants for chip ids
      bcma: add PCI ID for BCM43224
      bcma: complete workaround for BCMA43224 and BCM4313
      bcma: add bcma_pmu_spuravoid_pllupdate()

And then:
bcma: use custom printing functions
applies cleanly :)

After applying your patch I still found some pr_ statements in the code,
just use "grep pr_ drivers/bcma/ -r", is this intended?

Yes, it is. Sometimes we don't have bus reference (or it doesn't
exists at all yet). For such a situations I kept define of pr_fmt - it
allows us to still have "bcma: " prefix when using standard pr_<level>
functions.

I just send a new version of my patches for bcma, they are now removing
some functions form driver_chipcommon_pmu.c so your patch will not apply
on them any more.

Yeah, I'll. John: drop this version of patch as it won't apply.

-- 
Rafał