On 05/26/2012 12:51 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:

quoted

It took a while. There were some discussions and we agreed that your

quoted

changes establish a better integration with the regulatory framework.
There are some concerns about the content of the crda database, but that
is another thing outside the scope of your patches.

BTW if you would like to address anything please let me know. If you'd like
to review things in private too that's fine, just let me know. I
should say that the staging area for the next generation regulatory
code is being done through the regulatory simulator:

git://github.com/mcgrof/regsim.git

Thanks, Luis. I mainly focused on the crda database and it has a
relation freqs<->pwr_limit. In our regulatory code we make a distinction
between 11n and abg as we believe that is necessary. Another example
would be 20MHz transmission in 40MHz channel. Maybe that is taken into
account in crda code, but I did not have a close look at it yet.

I will have a look at the regsim repository and follow up on that.

Arend, in the future please trim all hunks that are not relevant to
your replies, that makes review easier.

Will do.

Gr. AvS