Re: [RFC 13/13] USB: Disable hub-initiated LPM for comms devices.

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 07:49:51AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 09:52:20PM -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote:

quoted

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:20:19PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

quoted

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 03:45:28PM -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote:

quoted

The Intel Windows folks are disabling hub-initiated LPM for all USB
communications devices under a xHCI USB 3.0 host.  In order to keep
the Linux behavior as close as possible to Windows, we need to do the
same in Linux.

How is the USB core on Windows determining that LPM should be turned off
for these devices?  Surely they aren't modifying each individual driver
like this is, right?  Any way we also can do this in the core?

No, I don't think they're modifying individual drivers.  Maybe they
placed a shim/filter driver below other drivers?

They can do this in their driver by just watching the device class type.

quoted

Basically, I don't know the exact details of what the Windows folks are
doing.  The recommendation from the Intel Windows team was simply to
turn hub-initiated LPM off for "all communications devices".  Perhaps
the Windows USB core is looking for specific USB class codes?  Or maybe
it has some older API that lets the core know it's a communications
device?

I'm not really sure we can do it in the USB core with out basically
duplicating all the class/PID/VID matching in the communications driver.
I think just adding a flag might be the best way.  I'm open to
suggestions though.

You can detect something as "simple" as a class type, which I bet is all
that Windows is going to be able to do as well.

quoted

quoted

Or, turn it around the other way, and only enable it if we know it's
safe to do so, in each driver, but I guess that would be even messier.

Yeah, I think it would be messier.

Ok, this is probably the best solution for us as well, sorry for the
noise.

No worries. :)

One of the problems with this patch is that several mailing lists
rejected it because of the large number of recipients in the Cc list,
even when just the mailing lists were on the Cc list.  Should I break it
up into a series of patches per driver?

Also, do I need to wait on acks from the other maintainers for this
change?  My instinct is no, since it shouldn't change the behavior of
their drivers with the USB devices that are out there today, but I don't
want to step on anyone's toes.

Sarah Sharp