Re: [PATCH -iwlwifi] iwlwifi: make tx_cmd_pool kmem cache global
From: Guy, Wey-Yi <hidden>
Date: 2012-02-27 15:41:25
Hi Stanislaw, On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 14:52 +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
Otherwise we are not able to run more than one device per driver: [ 24.743045] kmem_cache_create: duplicate cache iwl_dev_cmd [ 24.743051] Pid: 3165, comm: NetworkManager Not tainted 3.3.0-rc2-wl+ #5 [ 24.743054] Call Trace: [ 24.743066] [<ffffffff811717d5>] kmem_cache_create+0x655/0x700 [ 24.743073] [<ffffffff81061415>] ? destroy_timer_on_stack+0x15/0x20 [ 24.743079] [<ffffffff814e26ed>] ? schedule_timeout+0x1dd/0x330 [ 24.743083] [<ffffffff810617c0>] ? lock_timer_base+0x70/0x70 [ 24.743101] [<ffffffffa03b9f8b>] iwl_alive_notify+0x1cb/0x1f0 [iwlwifi] [ 24.743111] [<ffffffffa03ba442>] iwl_load_ucode_wait_alive+0x1b2/0x220 [iwlwifi] [ 24.743118] [<ffffffff810b1fbd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10 [ 24.743127] [<ffffffffa03b9700>] ? iwlagn_mac_setup_register+0x2e0/0x2e0 [iwlwifi] [ 24.743133] [<ffffffff814e60b4>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_bh+0x34/0x40 [ 24.743142] [<ffffffffa03ba893>] iwl_run_init_ucode+0x73/0x100 [iwlwifi] [ 24.743152] [<ffffffffa03b8fa1>] __iwl_up+0x81/0x220 [iwlwifi] [ 24.743161] [<ffffffffa03b91c0>] iwlagn_mac_start+0x80/0x190 [iwlwifi] [ 24.743188] [<ffffffffa03307b3>] ieee80211_do_open+0x293/0x770 [mac80211] Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <redacted> --- I tested patch on wireless testing tree, and then rebased to -iwlwifi tree, where did compile check only. This is basically a bugfix, but seems nobody except me (*) use more than one iwlwifi device per system, so I do not cc stable.
I am not totally understand what your patch doing, you make a global iwl_tx_cmd_pool structure, how that fix the multiple devices problem? global variable is not really a good programming exercise, true?
(*) I wonder why Intel developers do not run many devices in their systems. I think they should - one new device and a few older. Then perhaps we will stop seeing so many breakage on older devices caused by adding support for new hardware and features.
Yes, I am totally agree and we will start doing that btw, thanks for the help, I will merge all the patches from you on our internal tree first. Thanks Wey