Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 4 authors, 2012-02-29

Re: [PATCH -iwlwifi] iwlwifi: make tx_cmd_pool kmem cache global

From: Guy, Wey-Yi <hidden>
Date: 2012-02-27 15:41:25

Hi Stanislaw,

On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 14:52 +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
Otherwise we are not able to run more than one device per driver:

[   24.743045] kmem_cache_create: duplicate cache iwl_dev_cmd
[   24.743051] Pid: 3165, comm: NetworkManager Not tainted 3.3.0-rc2-wl+ #5
[   24.743054] Call Trace:
[   24.743066]  [<ffffffff811717d5>] kmem_cache_create+0x655/0x700
[   24.743073]  [<ffffffff81061415>] ? destroy_timer_on_stack+0x15/0x20
[   24.743079]  [<ffffffff814e26ed>] ? schedule_timeout+0x1dd/0x330
[   24.743083]  [<ffffffff810617c0>] ? lock_timer_base+0x70/0x70
[   24.743101]  [<ffffffffa03b9f8b>] iwl_alive_notify+0x1cb/0x1f0 [iwlwifi]
[   24.743111]  [<ffffffffa03ba442>] iwl_load_ucode_wait_alive+0x1b2/0x220 [iwlwifi]
[   24.743118]  [<ffffffff810b1fbd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[   24.743127]  [<ffffffffa03b9700>] ? iwlagn_mac_setup_register+0x2e0/0x2e0 [iwlwifi]
[   24.743133]  [<ffffffff814e60b4>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_bh+0x34/0x40
[   24.743142]  [<ffffffffa03ba893>] iwl_run_init_ucode+0x73/0x100 [iwlwifi]
[   24.743152]  [<ffffffffa03b8fa1>] __iwl_up+0x81/0x220 [iwlwifi]
[   24.743161]  [<ffffffffa03b91c0>] iwlagn_mac_start+0x80/0x190 [iwlwifi]
[   24.743188]  [<ffffffffa03307b3>] ieee80211_do_open+0x293/0x770 [mac80211]

Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <redacted>
---
I tested patch on wireless testing tree, and then rebased to -iwlwifi
tree, where did compile check only. This is basically a bugfix, but
seems nobody except me (*) use more than one iwlwifi device per system,
so I do not cc stable. 
I am not totally understand what your patch doing, you make a global
iwl_tx_cmd_pool structure, how that fix the multiple devices problem?
global variable is not really a good programming exercise, true?
(*) I wonder why Intel developers do not run many devices in their
systems. I think they should - one new device and a few older. Then
perhaps we will stop seeing so many breakage on older devices caused
by adding support for new hardware and features.
Yes, I am totally agree and we will start doing that

btw, thanks for the help, I will merge all the patches from you on our
internal tree first.

Thanks
Wey


Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help