[PATCH 1/3] wireless: rtlwifi: throw away MAC_FMT and use %pM instead · Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> · 2011-07-20
[PATCH 2/3] wireless: ath9k: use %pM to print MAC · Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> · 2011-07-20
Re: [PATCH 2/3] wireless: ath9k: use %pM to print MAC · Mohammed Shafi <hidden> · 2011-07-20
[PATCH 3/3] wireless: mwifiex: print hw address via %pM · Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> · 2011-07-20
RE: [PATCH 3/3] wireless: mwifiex: print hw address via %pM · Bing Zhao <hidden> · 2011-07-20
Re: [PATCH 1/3] wireless: rtlwifi: throw away MAC_FMT and use %pM instead · Larry Finger <hidden> · 2011-07-20
Re: [PATCH 1/3] wireless: rtlwifi: throw away MAC_FMT and use %pM instead · Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> · 2011-07-20
Re: [PATCH 1/3] wireless: rtlwifi: throw away MAC_FMT and use %pM instead · Larry Finger <hidden> · 2011-07-20

Re: [PATCH 1/3] wireless: rtlwifi: throw away MAC_FMT and use %pM instead

From: Larry Finger <hidden>
Date: 2011-07-20 16:31:12
Also in: lkml, netdev

On 07/20/2011 11:02 AM, Joe Perches wrote:

On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 10:47 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:

quoted

Thanks for the patch.

Hey Larry.

rtlwifi has a CONFIG_BT_COEXIST which is currently
unused/undefined by Kconfig.

Are there plans to enable this or should the code
just be removed?

There may be a few dependencies in rtlwifi for
variables set in this block so it seems from
superficial reading that removal might be a bit
involved.  I didn't look much more than that,
but struct btcoexist_priv doesn't seem to be
specified by the code anywhere.

I don't know the answer to that, but I have added Chaoming Li to the Cc. He will 
know if Realtek has any plans for BT coexistence.

Larry

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help