On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 05:04:41PM +0200, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:

On 07/22/2011 03:39 PM, John W. Linville wrote:

quoted

On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:24:00AM +0200, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:

quoted

On 07/22/2011 12:30 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:

quoted

2011/7/16 Hauke Mehrtens [off-list ref]:

quoted

quoted

quoted

@Ralf: Could you please merger this into the mips tree so that it will be in linux-3.1.

ML for bcma is linux-wireless. Should we pass that patches "via" Ralf
or John? Using linux-wireless (and John's tree) makes more sense to
me, as we will work on the same tree and will get less merge
conflicts. However don't take me as Linux development style guru, just
my POV.

quoted

I talked about this with Florian Fainelli and he said that the patches
should rather pass Ralf then John, but merging would be easier when they
are passing John. I do not have a problem with both solutions and
rebasing it to an other tree is no problem for me.
John and Ralf, who wants to take these patches? ;-)

I don't really care -- I figured Ralf was taking them due to the MIPS arch bits.

John

Hi John,

yes because of the MIPS arch bits it should go through Ralf, but there
are many changes for bcma in wireless-testing and adding my changes to
mips tree will cause some problems when wireless-testing and mips are
merged together by Linus.

Hauke

I'm happy to take them if Ralf agrees.  You'll need to repost them
(or at least send them to me again).

John
-- 
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com			might be all we have.  Be ready.