On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Dave Täht [off-list ref] wrote:

Sedat Dilek [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 11:22 PM, John W. Linville
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Announcement

The bufferbloat project [1] is pleased to announce the availability
of the debloat-testing Linux kernel git tree:

  git://git.infradead.org/debloat-testing.git

----snip----

quoted

Hi,

it should be "localversion-debloat" in the commit-subject in [1] (not
"localversion-wireless") :-).  "-db" as suffix is IMHO not very
meaningful... Why not add simply a suffix called "-debloat"?  (Anyway,
I will revert this patch because I don't want to have any suffix added
automatically.)

I have several other questions, but I start compiling first and test
this debloat kernel.

Excellent. At moment I would recommend building "low latency preempt
desktop" kernels with a high HZ value (400 or 1000), enabling highres
timers, and compiling in SFB as a module. (I'd like the default for SFB
to be "m" rather than "n", too)

quoted

Regards,
- Sedat -

[1] "Add localversion-wireless to identify builds from this tree."
http://git.infradead.org/debloat-testing.git/commit/3f9bdb4f44b076feda72d353d8ad717831416f36
_______________________________________________
Bloat-devel mailing list
Bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat-devel

--
Dave Taht
http://nex-6.taht.net

These "debloat guys" are fast :-).
I was just preparing my build-system (which I normally use to
debianize linux-next kernels).
Any other recommendation for kernel-config options?
For example:
linux-next has already CONFIG_NET_SCH_CHOKE (but I have unset it).
Which commits are in debloat-testing GIT but not in linux-next tree?
Are you planning debloat feature for 2.6.39?

- Sedat -