On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 07:39 -0800, Johannes Berg wrote:

On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 07:36 -0800, wwguy wrote:

quoted

quoted

@@ -503,7 +488,46 @@ static void iwlagn_check_needed_chains(s
 			 * will soon tell us about that.
 			 */
 			need_multiple = false;
+			rcu_read_unlock();
+			break;

why unlock and break here instead stay do it later like before?

Only because the indentation there was getting so deep it was annoying
to fit into 80 cols :-)

how you want to submit this patch? through iwlagn, or yo uwill send it
along with mac80211 to John?

Wey