Re: [PATCH 1/2] input: Add KEY_RFKILL_ALL
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: 2009-08-01 21:51:30
Also in:
linux-input
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2009-08-02 · Re: [PATCH 1/2] input: Add KEY_RFKILL_ALL · Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
- 2009-08-02 · Re: [PATCH 1/2] input: Add KEY_RFKILL_ALL · Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
- 2009-08-02 · Re: [PATCH 1/2] input: Add KEY_RFKILL_ALL · Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
- 2009-08-01 · Re: [PATCH 1/2] input: Add KEY_RFKILL_ALL · Matthew Garrett <hidden>
- 2009-08-01 · Re: [PATCH 1/2] input: Add KEY_RFKILL_ALL · Marcel Holtmann <hidden>
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 02:48:47PM -0700, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
why is it confusing? I don't understanding your argument here. I think the KEY_RFKILL_ALL is confusing is the user policy then only kills WiFi devices or toggles between various on/off combinations.
Having it be KEY_RFKILL implies that KEY_WLAN and similar aren't related to rfkill. KEY_RFKILL_ALL implies that the key invokes policy on all rfkill devices, which is the aim here. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org