Thread (16 messages) 16 messages, 7 authors, 2008-09-30

Re: [RFC/T] b43: to few loop tries in do_dummy_tx

From: Michael Buesch <hidden>
Date: 2008-09-29 18:39:06

On Monday 29 September 2008 20:31:58 Larry Finger wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Michael,

I have started modifying my copy of b43 to see if I can locate any
coding problems that might be causing the PHY transmission errors. To
start with, I am checking all the sections that use udelay. The main
reason is that when a bug in the CPU timer cut all delays in half, I
got these errors in b43legacy. I also noted the report this morning
that compiler and toolchain versions seem to be important.

One of the first places I looked was in do_dummy_tx. When I checked
the spin-on-condition loops in this routine, I found that the 3rd
always used the maximum number of loops and exited before the
condition was met. I increased the number of possible loops from 10 to
20 and found that it always takes 17 or 18 passes for the condition to
be met on my machine.

The existing code matches specs - I even checked the code in
4.150.10.5. It is too early to tell if this has anything to do with
the errors, but I suggest the following change:
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c
b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c
index 7205a93..af60122 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c
@@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ void b43_dummy_transmission(struct b43_wldev *dev)
 			break;
 		udelay(10);
 	}
-	for (i = 0x00; i < 0x0A; i++) {
+	for (i = 0x00; i < 0x19; i++) {
 		value = b43_read16(dev, 0x0690);
 		if (!(value & 0x0100))
 			break;
Using 25 passes gives a little margin for CPUs that are much faster
than mine. Perhaps the margin should even be bigger.

Yeah, feel free to submit this to John.
Dummy-tx _can_ for sure trigger PHY TX errors. I already saw that
in my experiments, too. It also makes sense, as dummy-tx is poking
with the lowlevel TX hardware.
So if a loop exists early it may leave TX hardware in an inconsistent state.

Actually, I do know since the very first days of bcm43xx that the
loop counts are not big enough in some of these loops. But I didn't
change it, as it was said the current counts match the specs.
However, I think it's perfectly valid to raise the values.
Please do so, thanks a lot.

-- 
Greetings Michael.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help