Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 4 authors, 2008-08-25

Re: CPU load after killing iwlagn with RF kill switch

From: John W. Linville <hidden>
Date: 2008-08-17 17:32:48
Also in: lkml

On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 07:20:54PM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 6:02 PM, John W. Linville
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 10:04:12AM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
quoted
There is gap in current rfkill implementation that we didn't close
yet.  There were also few patches that were not signed by Intel and
are apparently wrong.
Can you be more specific?  Do you know which patches are wrong (even
if you don't know how to fix them)?
80fcc9e28cf3a209fbfb39a7bbddc313c59c7424
This one  is wrong and there are more then are not acked even though
they cause no problem. In general I would prefer that patches will be
acked by Yi or me.
And in general, they are.  In general I would prefer if you would
work upstream instead of working in iwlwifi-2.6 and periodically
dumping a dozen or more patches on me all at once.  C'est la vie...
I will try to rebase our rfkill fixes ASAP from iwlwifi-2.6. iwl5000 branch.
Thanks!

John
-- 
John W. Linville
linville@tuxdriver.com
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help