Re: CPU load after killing iwlagn with RF kill switch
From: John W. Linville <hidden>
Date: 2008-08-17 17:32:48
Also in:
lkml
From: John W. Linville <hidden>
Date: 2008-08-17 17:32:48
Also in:
lkml
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 07:20:54PM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 6:02 PM, John W. Linville [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 10:04:12AM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:quoted
There is gap in current rfkill implementation that we didn't close yet. There were also few patches that were not signed by Intel and are apparently wrong.Can you be more specific? Do you know which patches are wrong (even if you don't know how to fix them)?80fcc9e28cf3a209fbfb39a7bbddc313c59c7424 This one is wrong and there are more then are not acked even though they cause no problem. In general I would prefer that patches will be acked by Yi or me.
And in general, they are. In general I would prefer if you would work upstream instead of working in iwlwifi-2.6 and periodically dumping a dozen or more patches on me all at once. C'est la vie...
I will try to rebase our rfkill fixes ASAP from iwlwifi-2.6. iwl5000 branch.
Thanks! John -- John W. Linville linville@tuxdriver.com