Patrick McHardy wrote:

Larry Finger wrote:

quoted

Patrick McHardy wrote:

quoted

Larry Finger wrote:

quoted

=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
2.6.26-Linus-git-05752-g93ded9b #49

                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ dirty?

This kernel is not using the patches we sent.

No, but they didn't make any difference. I tried with all 3 applied, 
then backed them out one by one. That was the state when I posted before.

Well, this is a completely different warning.

quoted

Here are the dumps with all 3 patches applied:

=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
2.6.26-Linus-05752-g93ded9b-dirty #53
---------------------------------------------
b43/1997 is trying to acquire lock:
 (_xmit_IEEE80211#2){-...}, at: [<ffffffffa028f322>] 
ieee80211_scan_completed+0x130/0x2e1 [mac80211]

but task is already holding lock:
 (_xmit_IEEE80211#2){-...}, at: [<ffffffffa028f322>] 
ieee80211_scan_completed+0x130/0x2e1 [mac80211] 

Sorry. After all those kernel builds I got bleary-eyed and just looked for 
recursive locking without any regard for the details.

Larry