Thread (17 messages) 17 messages, 5 authors, 2008-01-02

Re: [PATCH] mac80211: better rate control algorithm selection

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date: 2008-01-02 08:45:40

On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 09:41:15AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
quoted
Why don't we just build the rate control algorithms entirely separate
useing obj-$(FOO) ?  If they're modular that lets them be their own
module, and if they're built-in they'll still go into built-in.o.
Yeah. Except that they can't be built-in if mac80211 isn't, and we've
repeatedly had users f' up their installations and bitterly report to us
that mac80211 doesn't work because no rate control algorithm is
available so we wanted to force having one built into mac80211.ko unless
specifically turned off (only with EMBEDDED).
Building an algorithm optionally into mac80211 seems rather odd.  In
case mac80211 the algorithms should be their own modules and you should
use request_module to make sure at least one is loaded.  Or if you
really want to make sure one is alway avaiabable always build the
simplest one directly and unconditionally into mac80211.ko.
johannes

---end quoted text---
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help