Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 3 authors, 2025-01-15

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: usb: usb-device: Add panel-location

From: Ricardo Ribalda <hidden>
Date: 2025-01-08 08:51:49
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-media, lkml

On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 at 09:45, Sakari Ailus [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Ricardo,

On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 11:37:18AM +0100, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
quoted
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 at 23:00, Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 6:42 AM Ricardo Ribalda [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 at 13:24, Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 04:24:27PM +0100, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
quoted
Hi Rob

On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 at 16:02, Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 09:44:37PM +0000, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
quoted
For some devices like cameras the system needs to know where they are
mounted.
Why do you need this and why only this property and not the dozens
others ACPI has?
Userspace needs that information to correctly show it in the UI. Eg;

- User facing camera needs to be mirrored during preview.
- The user facing camera is selected by default during videoconferences
- The world facing camera is selected by default when taking a photo
- User facing camera have different parameter defaults than world facing.
We already have "orientation" defined for this purpose.
Do you mean orientation from
bindings/media/video-interface-devices.yaml ?

I see a couple of issues:
- Orientation has a very specific meaning for USB typeC. I'd prefer if
we could avoid using that word.
Yes, but this is tied to the class of the device, not the bus. I find
defining the position for USB devices confusing.
quoted
- For other applications different than cameras it might be useful to
know the positions top, bottom, left, right, which are not available
in video-interface-devices
Other devices may need some of the 20 other properties in the ACPI
table as well.
quoted
- The value "external" does not makes too much sense for listed usb devices
Then don't use it.
quoted
- It makes our lives easier if dt and acpi have the same meaning (less
conversion)
We have little to no input into what ACPI does. If we're just going to
copy ACPI, then just use ACPI instead.
quoted
All that said, for my specific usecase, reusing orientation from
bindings/media/video-interface-devices.yaml works... So if that is
what you all prefer I can send a v2 with that.
Let me know what you think
We already have something for cameras. Use it.
So you are proposing a change like this?
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-device.yaml
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-device.yaml
index da890ee60ce6..5322772a4470 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-device.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-device.yaml
@@ -37,6 +37,10 @@ properties:
       but a device adhering to this binding may leave out all except
       for "usbVID,PID".

+  orientation:
+    description: If present, specifies the orientation of the usb device.
+    $ref: /schemas/media/video-interface-devices.yaml#/properties/orientation
Do you need this for a camera or for other kinds of USB devices, too?

What about e.g. the rotation property?
I need it for cameras. I do not have a usecase for rotation now, but I
might have in the future.
quoted
+


   reg:
     description: the number of the USB hub port or the USB host-controller
       port to which this device is attached. The range is 1-255.
--
Regards,

Sakari Ailus


-- 
Ricardo Ribalda
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help