Re: [PATCH] usb-storage: Add compatibility quirk flags for iODD 2531/2541
From: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Date: 2021-10-15 13:39:03
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 09:54:45AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 01:29:20AM -0500, braewoods@braewoods.net wrote:quoted
On 2021-10-13 21:20, Alan Stern wrote:quoted
In the future, you should always include a version number in the email Subject: line (for example, "[PATCH v2]") so that readers will know which patch is which. And you should include, here just below the "---" line, a description of how this version differs from the previous version. See the email archives for examples of multi-version patches. Nevertheless, this looks okay. Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>Noted. I'll do that for future patches. On a side note, any idea how long it normally takes to get a simple patch like this committed? I've had mixed experiences with getting feedback on patches. Sometimes my patches just get totally ignored.Depends on the subsystem and the patch submitted.
Greg tends to be quite good at merging patches in a timely manner. They generally are committed within a few weeks. In this case, should the patch also be added to the -stable kernels? Alan Stern
Also always use scripts/get_maintainer.pl to properly copy the needed maintainers and mailing lists. Sometimes patches get lost in the noise if the right people are not copied. thanks, greg k-h