Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 3 authors, 2021-09-25

Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: f_uac2: fixed EP-IN wMaxPacketSize

From: Pavel Hofman <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-24 08:35:34

Hi Greg,

Dne 24. 09. 21 v 10:20 Greg KH napsal(a):
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 10:00:27AM +0200, Pavel Hofman wrote:
quoted
Async feedback patches broke enumeration on Windows 10 previously fixed
by commit 789ea77310f0 ("usb: gadget: f_uac2: always increase endpoint
max_packet_size by one audio slot").

While the existing calculation for EP OUT capture for async mode yields
size+1 frame due to uac2_opts->fb_max > 0, playback side lost the +1
feature.  Therefore the +1 frame addition must be re-introduced for
playback. Win10 enumerates the device only when both EP IN and EP OUT
max packet sizes are (at least) +1 frame.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Hofman <redacted>
Tested-by: Henrik Enquist <redacted>
Tested-by: Jack Pham <redacted>
---
  drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_uac2.c | 14 ++++++++++----
  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
What commit does this fix?

Should it go to stable kernel(s)?
It's the same effort direction as commit 
https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb/+/f5dfd98a80ff8d50cf4ae2820857d7f5a46cbab9 
which you added to your usb-linus branch 
https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb/+log/refs/heads/usb-linus/drivers/usb/gadget/function 
Therefore I would say usb-linus.

Please what are your rules for usb-linus and usb-next? There are some 
different commits in usb-next and usb-linus changing the same file - 
f_uac2.c . Likely not, but a conflict could potentially occur. I do not 
know what head to rebase my further patches which also make larger 
changes to that file.

Thanks a lot for explanation,

Pavel.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help