Hi Greg,

On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 02:09:45PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 03:01:53PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:

quoted

Hi Greg,

On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 11:47:25AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

Note, you are responding to an email from a very long time ago...

Yeah, was sort of purpose :) (to try to retain the original context of
the question of if the commits should be backported to stable series,
which back then had no need raised)

quoted

quoted

Due to the lack of response, I guess they don't need to go to any stable
kernel, so will queue them up for 5.11-rc1.

At least one user in Debian (https://bugs.debian.org/992004) would be
happy to have those backported as well to the 5.10.y series (which we
will pick up).

So if Benjamin ack's this, this would be great to have in 5.10.y.

What are the git commit ids?  Just ask for them to be applied to stable
like normal...

Right, aplogies. The two commits were
47ea2929d58c35598e681212311d35b240c373ce and
217504a055325fe76ec1142aa15f14d3db77f94f.

47ea2929d58c ("usb: typec: ucsi: acpi: Always decode connector change information")
217504a05532 ("usb: typec: ucsi: Work around PPM losing change information")

and in the followup Benjamin Berg mentioned to pick as well

8c9b3caab3ac26db1da00b8117901640c55a69dd

8c9b3caab3ac ("usb: typec: ucsi: Clear pending after acking connector change"

a related fix later on.

Regards,
Salvatore